| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Cahoon v. Cummings ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Cahoon v. Cummings
''Cahoon v. Cummings'', 734 N.E.2d 535 (Ind. 2000), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of Indiana that adopted the loss of a chance doctrine for tort liability.〔Henderson, J.A. et al. ''The Torts Process, Seventh Edition.'' Aspen Publishers, New York, NY: 2007, p. 263〕
==Decision==
The plaintiff brought a wrongful death action alleging that the defendant doctor negligently failed to diagnose the decedent's esophageal cancer. The trial court instructed the jury to find the defendant liable if the failure to diagnose was deemed a substantial factor in the decedent's death. The jury found for the plaintiff and the defendant appealed.〔Henderson, p. 263〕
The Supreme Court of Indiana eschewed the substantial factor test for liability because it would unfairly hold doctors liable for the patient's underlying disease and all of the damage it caused. Instead the court adopted the loss of a chance doctrine,which allows recovery if negligence results in a substantially higher probability that harm to the plaintiff will result, even if the probability of harm is already over fifty percent. The court held that the defendants should only be held liable in proportion to the increased chance of harm caused by their negligence, and the case was remanded for a new trial.〔Henderson, p. 264〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Cahoon v. Cummings」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|